PortfoliosLab logo
^XSP vs. ^SPXEW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ^XSP and ^SPXEW is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

^XSP vs. ^SPXEW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 Mini-SPX Options Index (^XSP) and S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index (^SPXEW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

^XSP:

0.64

^SPXEW:

0.35

Sortino Ratio

^XSP:

1.09

^SPXEW:

0.68

Omega Ratio

^XSP:

1.16

^SPXEW:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

^XSP:

0.72

^SPXEW:

0.37

Martin Ratio

^XSP:

2.74

^SPXEW:

1.34

Ulcer Index

^XSP:

4.95%

^SPXEW:

5.13%

Daily Std Dev

^XSP:

19.62%

^SPXEW:

17.35%

Max Drawdown

^XSP:

-25.43%

^SPXEW:

-60.83%

Current Drawdown

^XSP:

-3.02%

^SPXEW:

-4.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^XSP achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly lower than ^SPXEW's 1.65% return.


^XSP

YTD

1.31%

1M

12.94%

6M

1.50%

1Y

12.48%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

^SPXEW

YTD

1.65%

1M

10.30%

6M

-1.47%

1Y

6.21%

5Y*

14.30%

10Y*

7.97%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

^XSP vs. ^SPXEW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^XSP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^XSP is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^XSP is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^XSP is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^XSP is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^XSP is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^XSP is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

^SPXEW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^SPXEW is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^SPXEW is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^SPXEW is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^SPXEW is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^SPXEW is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^SPXEW is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

^XSP vs. ^SPXEW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Mini-SPX Options Index (^XSP) and S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index (^SPXEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ^XSP Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the ^SPXEW Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^XSP and ^SPXEW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

^XSP vs. ^SPXEW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^XSP drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, smaller than the maximum ^SPXEW drawdown of -60.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XSP and ^SPXEW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

^XSP vs. ^SPXEW - Volatility Comparison

S&P 500 Mini-SPX Options Index (^XSP) and S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index (^SPXEW) have volatilities of 5.42% and 5.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...